They've declared as witnesses and when been asked about internal procedures on dealing with evidences collected from a terrorist crime scenario, all of them have agreed there are evidences which never are disposed of, even more, if any evidence should be disposed a Judge order is needed.
In order that foreign people may have a neat idea about why all this dispute arose from the very first days after the massacre, I'll let you view some pictures:
Four commuters were attacked.
Ten blasts destroyed ten carriages.
This is one of them, the fifth carriage in a commuter stopped near Atocha railway station, where four blasts killed 60+ people and injured 300+ more ones.
The carriage after the blast:
The carriage 30 hours later, after evidence collection:
This is the only one evidence which was analyzed, nothing more was preserved (since the very first day):
As I said, four carriages were attacked, these are all of the evidences preserved (since the very first day):
Yes, you've seen it properly, out of four carriages, only those three evidences, which means that at least from one of the commuters there's no evidence left, and I say "at least from one" because the evidence in the bottom of the picture is not known which carriage belongs to.
Do we have a right to claim there's an obscure affair about 3/11 Madrid bombings?
No comments:
Post a Comment