A victims association has asked the Court which ruled the cause on 3/11 Madrid bombings for "El Chino" marriage documents and the Court has denied it.
Nowadays who really was (or is) "El Chino" is a major dispute regarding 3/11 investigation. Up to official statements, "El Chino" commited suicide at Leganes, but evidences show there is much confussion about who he really was. It seems "El Chino" is a mix made out of diverse characters.
The mentiones victims association (3/11 victims aid) still seeks for the truth, by the end of the judgement they asked the Court to indict several members of Spanish security corps due to their lies in the trial, but the Court said it was not the right moment to do so and asked victims to wait and ask for the rest of documents they had not seen.
One of those documents was this one, "El Chino" marriage documents.
Why does the Court deny it to victims?
Do you beleive Spanish institutions behaviour is acceptable? Definitely NOT.
We shall know the truth and all those who should have worked for it and didn't will go to jail.
Is "El Chino" still alive? his wife's declaration in the trial was quite surprising, at times she referred to him as if he were alive.
2008-10-30
2008-10-29
3/11 A coup?
Tons of evidences show that Spanish institutions are not willing to let the truth arise.
A single one:
It is not possible that a mobile phone allegedly used by terrorists just before inmolation at Leganes to say goodbye to their families in Marroc and to receive orders from mates at London, could be receiving incoming calls six weeks later.
But that's the case according to setence; journalist Luis del Pino remarked that absurd statement in sentence, then the Court ammended it, saying it was an error and established the "good" mobile line number used, but it too was used six weeks later and again, Luis del Pino showed it was not possible, but Court didn't dare to recognise their error, so it's still there, in sentence.
It is quite possible that 3/11 was a coup.
A single one:
It is not possible that a mobile phone allegedly used by terrorists just before inmolation at Leganes to say goodbye to their families in Marroc and to receive orders from mates at London, could be receiving incoming calls six weeks later.
But that's the case according to setence; journalist Luis del Pino remarked that absurd statement in sentence, then the Court ammended it, saying it was an error and established the "good" mobile line number used, but it too was used six weeks later and again, Luis del Pino showed it was not possible, but Court didn't dare to recognise their error, so it's still there, in sentence.
It is quite possible that 3/11 was a coup.
2008-05-16
3/11 Who could do it?
I believe everybody agree it was carried out by an organized team of criminals.
Taking in account every possibility, we may say that they are among these:
1.- Al Qaeda or any of its local cells.
2.- ETA: local terrorist group operating in Spain for the last 40 years.
3.- Spanish security corps.
4.- Foreign security corps.
5.- Any combination among the above.
That is: we cannot say it was not a coup.
Taking in account every possibility, we may say that they are among these:
1.- Al Qaeda or any of its local cells.
2.- ETA: local terrorist group operating in Spain for the last 40 years.
3.- Spanish security corps.
4.- Foreign security corps.
5.- Any combination among the above.
That is: we cannot say it was not a coup.
3/11 trial: the sentence - part I
On last October, the 31st, the court ruling the trial against 29 indicted sentenced just 3 of them to blame for the attacks: Two Moroccans and one Spaniard. All those indicted as masterminds became acquitted.
Can we say prosecutors made their job?
Well, that's a matter of what that "job" was. If we think their job was to conduct a good investigation in order to bring to justice all those who played any role in the attacks, definitely prosecutors didn't do their job.
Do the official version stand after the sentence?
Public opinion was lead to think that it was Al Qaeda in retaliation for Spain's role at Iraq. The only one blamed for plotting the bombs is not a radical Muslim at all, neither the other Moroccan nor the Spaniard blamed too. All those said to be tied to Al Qaeda became acquitted. So, where is Al Qaeda?
Can we say prosecutors made their job?
Well, that's a matter of what that "job" was. If we think their job was to conduct a good investigation in order to bring to justice all those who played any role in the attacks, definitely prosecutors didn't do their job.
Do the official version stand after the sentence?
Public opinion was lead to think that it was Al Qaeda in retaliation for Spain's role at Iraq. The only one blamed for plotting the bombs is not a radical Muslim at all, neither the other Moroccan nor the Spaniard blamed too. All those said to be tied to Al Qaeda became acquitted. So, where is Al Qaeda?
2008-01-15
Is our Prime Minister reliable?
Can we, the Spaniards, trust our Government?
On the past two days, Sunday and Monday, the second most read newspaper in Spain has published an interview with Mr Zapatero, our Prime Minister after 11-M (That's how we call that terrible day instead of 03/11, the English way).
His policy regarding internal affairs has been to negotiate with the local terrorist group, ETA, to give up weapons. ETA victims have not been taken into account in his policy, it just mattered terrorists claims, but victims looking for justice have been a terrible headache for our Government over the last three years, when Mr Zapatero begun to say he was willing to free from jail ETA criminals, to let them return to our regional Parliaments and city Councils even not complying with one sentence from Spanish Supreme Court judging as belonging to ETA some political parties.
That happened by the end of 2005 and victim's opposition to Mr Zapatero's internal affairs policy increased as the political benefits to terrorists became apparent. By march 2006 ETA said they would never kill again, but by 2006 ending, a terrible attack against Madrid airport, Barajas, killed two people.
After that, Mr Zapatero told negotiations finished there, his Internal Affairs Minister did so and many other Ministers from our Government, though their behaviour didn't show it was credible.
Yesterday, in that interview, Mr Zapatero says he went on negotiating for several months after Madrid airport attack.
A now these question arise:
Why should we relay on him?
Why not thinking he still negotiates with terrorists?
Would he be doing the same in the international scenario?
Keep an eye on Spain, I believe 11M consequences are about to fall over all of us and it will impact deeply beyond our borders.
By next 03/09 we have a new elections day.
On the past two days, Sunday and Monday, the second most read newspaper in Spain has published an interview with Mr Zapatero, our Prime Minister after 11-M (That's how we call that terrible day instead of 03/11, the English way).
His policy regarding internal affairs has been to negotiate with the local terrorist group, ETA, to give up weapons. ETA victims have not been taken into account in his policy, it just mattered terrorists claims, but victims looking for justice have been a terrible headache for our Government over the last three years, when Mr Zapatero begun to say he was willing to free from jail ETA criminals, to let them return to our regional Parliaments and city Councils even not complying with one sentence from Spanish Supreme Court judging as belonging to ETA some political parties.
That happened by the end of 2005 and victim's opposition to Mr Zapatero's internal affairs policy increased as the political benefits to terrorists became apparent. By march 2006 ETA said they would never kill again, but by 2006 ending, a terrible attack against Madrid airport, Barajas, killed two people.
After that, Mr Zapatero told negotiations finished there, his Internal Affairs Minister did so and many other Ministers from our Government, though their behaviour didn't show it was credible.
Yesterday, in that interview, Mr Zapatero says he went on negotiating for several months after Madrid airport attack.
A now these question arise:
Why should we relay on him?
Why not thinking he still negotiates with terrorists?
Would he be doing the same in the international scenario?
Keep an eye on Spain, I believe 11M consequences are about to fall over all of us and it will impact deeply beyond our borders.
By next 03/09 we have a new elections day.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)