Mr Pedro Díaz has contradicted Mr Juan J Sánchez as of how would have been handled commuters evidences after blasts, he has said that evidences should have been sent to Scientific Police Unit to perform chemical analysis in order to find out which explosive was used. The Lab at Explosive Deactivation Unit is poorly equipped and is used only to make quick analysis to help on the ground units when handling with explosive devices, but scientific analysis, i.e. suited to stand in a Court, are always carried out at Scientific Police Labs.
When asked about commuters having being sent to scrapyard a few days after the massacre, Mr Pedro Díaz answered that Prosecutor's order is needed and he did so, but there's no document about it.
3/11 Madrid bombings Prosecutor, Judge Mr Juan del Olmo, didn't issue such order or he never included it in summary.
Here you may see a document released bu RENFE (Spain's railway operator) stating commuters scrapping was carried out on March 13th and 14th 2004.
Just two days after the terrorist attack, when Spaniards were called by massive SMS sent to thousands of mobile phones to angry demonstrations against the Government party and during the elections day, commuters were being scrapped.
After that, only a few nails remain as evidences and with commuters carriages scrapped, almost no chance is left to carry out scientific analysis to find out which explosive was used to kill nearly 200 and injure nearly 2000.
What a nonsense it is!
Do we have a right to ask for 3/11 Madrid bombings truth?
No comments:
Post a Comment